ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Post-COVID-19 exercise intolerance is poorly understood. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) can identify the underlying exercise limitations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the source and magnitude of exercise intolerance in post-COVID-19 subjects. METHODS: Cohort study assessing subjects with different COVID-19 illness severities and a control group selected by propensity score matching. In a selected sample with CPET prior to viral infection, before and after comparisons were performed. Level of significance was 5% in the entire analysis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four subjects with COVID-19 were assessed (median age: 43.0 years, 57% male), with different illness severities (60% mild, 21% moderate, 19% severe). CPET was performed 11.5 (7.0, 21.2) weeks after disease onset, with exercise limitations being attributed to the peripheral muscle (92%), and the pulmonary (6%), and cardiovascular (2%) systems. Lower median percent-predicted peak oxygen uptake was observed in the severe subgroup (72.2%) as compared to the controls (91.6%). Oxygen uptake differed among illness severities and controls at peak and ventilatory thresholds. Conversely, ventilatory equivalents, oxygen uptake efficiency slope, and peak oxygen pulse were similar. Subgroup analysis of 42 subjects with prior CPET revealed significant reduction in only peak treadmill speed in the mild subgroup and in oxygen uptake at peak and ventilatory thresholds in the moderate/severe subgroup. By contrast, ventilatory equivalents, oxygen uptake efficiency slope, and peak oxygen pulse did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral muscle fatigue was the most common exercise limitation etiology in post-COVID-19 patients regardless of the illness severity. Data suggest that treatment should emphasize comprehensive rehabilitation programs, including aerobic and muscle strengthening components.
FUNDAMENTO: A intolerância ao exercício pós-COVID-19 não é bem entendida. O teste de esforço cardiopulmonar (TECP) pode identificar as limitações ao exercício subjacentes. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a etiologia e a magnitude da intolerância ao exercício em sujeitos pós-COVID-19. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte que avaliou sujeitos com níveis de gravidades diferentes da doença COVID-19 e um grupo de controle selecionado por pareamento por escores de propensão. Em uma amostra seleta com TECP anterior à infecção viral disponível, foram realizadas comparações antes e depois. O nível de significância foi de 5% em toda a análise. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados cento e quarenta e dois sujeitos com COVID-19 (idade mediana: 43 anos, 57% do sexo masculino), com níveis de gravidade de doença diferentes (60% leve, 21% moderada, 19% grave). O TECP foi realizado 11,5 (7,0, 21,2) semanas após o aparecimento da doença, com as limitações ao exercício sendo atribuídas aos sistemas muscular periférico (92%), pulmonar (6%), e cardiovascular (2%). Menor valor mediano do consumo de oxigênio pico percentual foi observado no subgrupo com níveis graves de doença (72,2%) em comparação com os controles (91,6%). O consumo de oxigênio foi diferente entre os grupos com diferentes níveis de gravidade de doença e o controle no pico e nos limiares ventilatórios. Inversamente, os equivalentes ventilatórios, a inclinação da eficiência do consumo de oxigênio, e o pico do pulso de oxigênio foram semelhantes. A análise do subgrupo de 42 sujeitos com TECP prévio revelou uma redução significativa no pico de velocidade da esteira no subgrupo com nível leve de doença, e no consumo de oxigênio no pico e nos limiares ventilatórios nos subgrupos com níveis moderado/grave. Por outro lado, os equivalentes ventilatórios, a inclinação da eficiência do consumo de oxigênio e o pico do pulso de oxigênio não apresentaram alterações significativas. CONCLUSÕES: A fadiga do músculo periférico foi a etiologia de limitação de exercício mais comum em pacientes pós-COVID-19 independentemente da gravidade da doença. Os dados sugerem que o tratamento deve enfatizar programas de reabilitação abrangentes, incluindo componentes aeróbicos e de fortalecimento muscular.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Exercise Test , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Cohort Studies , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Oxygen , Exercise Tolerance/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The efficacy of pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 infection 12-lead ECGs for identifying athletes with myopericarditis has never been reported. We aimed to assess the prevalence and significance of de-novo ECG changes following COVID-19 infection. METHODS: In this multicentre observational study, between March 2020 and May 2022, we evaluated consecutive athletes with COVID-19 infection. Athletes exhibiting de-novo ECG changes underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scans. One club mandated CMR scans for all players (n=30) following COVID-19 infection, despite the absence of cardiac symptoms or de-novo ECG changes. RESULTS: 511 soccer players (median age 21 years, IQR 18-26 years) were included. 17 (3%) athletes demonstrated de-novo ECG changes, which included reduction in T-wave amplitude in the inferior and lateral leads (n=5), inferior leads (n=4) and lateral leads (n=4); inferior T-wave inversion (n=7); and ST-segment depression (n=2). 15 (88%) athletes with de-novo ECG changes revealed evidence of inflammatory cardiac sequelae. All 30 athletes who underwent a mandatory CMR scan had normal findings. Athletes revealing de-novo ECG changes had a higher prevalence of cardiac symptoms (71% vs 12%, p<0.0001) and longer median symptom duration (5 days, IQR 3-10) compared with athletes without de-novo ECG changes (2 days, IQR 1-3, p<0.001). Among athletes without cardiac symptoms, the additional yield of de-novo ECG changes to detect cardiac inflammation was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: 3% of athletes demonstrated de-novo ECG changes post COVID-19 infection, of which 88% were diagnosed with cardiac inflammation. Most affected athletes exhibited cardiac symptoms; however, de-novo ECG changes contributed to a diagnosis of cardiac inflammation in 20% of athletes without cardiac symptoms.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Soccer , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Prevalence , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Electrocardiography , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Athletes , Inflammation , COVID-19 TestingABSTRACT
Among the multiple uncertainties surrounding the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, a research letter published in The Lancet implicated drugs that antagonize the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in an unfavorable prognosis of COVID-19. This report prompted investigations to identify mechanisms by which blocking angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) could lead to serious consequences in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The possible association between RAAS inhibitors use and unfavorable prognosis in this disease may have been biased by the presence of underlying cardiovascular diseases. As the number of COVID-19 cases has increased worldwide, it has now become possible to investigate the association between RAAS inhibitors and unfavorable prognosis in larger cohorts. Observational studies and one randomized clinical trial failed to identify any consistent association between the use of these drugs and unfavorable prognosis in COVID-19. In view of the accumulated clinical evidence, several scientific societies recommend that treatment with RAAS inhibitors should not be discontinued in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (unless contraindicated). This recommendation should be followed by clinicians and patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Renin-Angiotensin System , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) showed increased morbidity and mortality rates and worse prognosis in individuals with underlying chronic diseases, especially cardiovascular disease and its risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. There is also evidence of possible links among COVID-19, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Emerging evidence suggests a pro-inflammatory milieu and hypercoagulable state in patients with this infection. Despite anticoagulation, a large proportion of patients requiring intensive care may develop life-threatening thrombotic complications. Indeed, the levels of some markers of hemostatic activation, such as D-dimer, are commonly elevated in COVID-19, indicating potential risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism. In this review, we critically examine and discuss aspects of hypercoagulability and inflammation in COVID-19 and the possible benefits of statins in this scenario, with emphasis on their underlying molecular mechanisms. Moreover, we present recommendations on the use of antiviral drugs in combination with statins.